The development of absolute strength as an athletic quality is pivotal for sporting success. Strength and conditioning coaches, personal trainers, and performance coaches around the world use many different means to create strong, powerful athletes. The debate heard around the strength world is whether athletes should be using powerlifting or traditional Olympic style weightlifting movements (and which is more productive). Addressing that argument is beyond the scope of this article. However, I will give you five very good reasons why powerlifting exercises and repetition schemes should be used in your athletic conditioning programs.
1. Stronger athletes use less energy.
In tight games that come down to the wire, it’s often the stronger and better conditioned team that comes out on top. This is also true for individual sports such as wrestling and mixed martial arts. Many would attribute success at the end of a game to the conditioning and energy systems training that the athletes have done. While this is true and necessary, it doesn’t tell the whole story.
Each step becomes easier and requires the expenditure of less energy when a person has increased his levels of absolute strength. When this is translated into athletic competition, the effect is even greater because force is being generated as quickly as possible, requiring greater amounts of energy. So when athletes can generate more force and are more neuromuscularly efficient, they’ll use less energy to complete each task required of them during competition. The ability to generate large amounts of force and neuromuscular efficiency are both products of powerlifting type training.
2. Moving loads quickly is still emphasized.
One of the most common criticisms of using powerlifting exercises and rep schemes to train athletes is the slow movement of the load. This is a misconception that is far from reality. Moving a load as quickly as possible is always emphasized. While completing a maximal effort squat, a lifter is never trying to move the weight slowly. The intention is always to move the weight as quickly as possible. Due to this fact, those who use maximal effort training become more powerful at all training loads (1).
The conjugate method is a common methodology among powerlifters. Using this method of training allows an athlete to develop different skills concurrently by employing different rate and load protocols. The three integral components of the conjugate method are the maximal effort, which is working to a one to three rep maximum; the dynamic effort, which involves moving a submaximal load as quickly as possible; and the repetition effort, which involves moving a submaximal load until failure. The goal of the dynamic effort method is rate of force production, a key component of athletic training. Loads are being moved as quickly as possible, making an athlete more powerful and better able to express the strength gained through maximal effort training explosively. One would be hard pressed to find a coach who doesn’t want a stronger and more explosive athlete.
3. Stronger athletes can run faster and jump higher.
Power and speed are the two most commonly examined markers of athleticism applied to team sport athletes with the vertical jump test and the 40-yard dash the most common tests to determine appropriate levels of these two qualities. If success in these two tests is compared with a strong performance in a squat one rep maximum test, you’ll see a strong correlation.
Research has shown that maximum effort squat strength is easily related to performance in the vertical jump test. Athletes who scored strongly on the one rep maximum squat test had higher vertical jumps compared to those who didn’t perform as well. It has also been shown that as strength in the squat improves, so does vertical jump height. When applied to competition, the vertical jump has been shown to be a great measure of athletic success (2).
Squat strength has also been examined in relation to sprinting speed. Using Division I football players, a study compared squat strength, strength/body mass ratio, and sprinting speed. It was found that the athletes with the highest strength/body mass ratio had the best sprinting times. The stronger athletes were able to apply greater amounts of force to the ground, allowing them to sprint at greater velocities (3). When measurements of maximal strength are applied to athletic tests, it is obvious that employing maximal effort training for athletic conditioning is a must.
4. Deadlifting is functional!
“An exercise is not deemed functional by the way it looks but by what it produces.” The quote above is from Gray Cook, and when training athletes, it rings profoundly true. Our industry’s current trend toward functional training leaves many of us confused about what functional training actually is. I don’t think that it can be said any better than it has been by Gray Cook. We need to examine the application of exercises to our athletes by what they will get out of them. The deadlift is a perfect exercise to look at in this perspective.
In order to keep all things equal, let’s look at the conventional barbell deadlift. What is required to complete this lift and what would an athlete obtain from its completion? If we start from the ground up, the ankle needs the ability to dorsiflex properly and then translate from dorsiflexion into plantar flexion as the lifter applies force to the ground. The knee must have the ability to properly stabilize as force is produced, and the hips must have the mobility to descend into the proper lifting position. Examining the core, we see that the glutes must fire properly to work as the primary hip extensor, and the abdominal musculature, along with the spinal erectors, must stabilize the spine so that force can be generated. The hamstrings must assist the glutes in extending the hips while the quadriceps apply the initial force to move the weight off of the floor. Strong lats and traps and strong upper back musculature give the pull that help the spine to stabilize. This allows the athlete to “lockout” the weight. Let’s not forget the grip strength required to hold on to the bar throughout the movement. If there is a sport that doesn’t demand all of these functional qualities from its athletes, I would certainly like to see it.
There is also a certain part of the kinetic chain that is always a hot topic in sport conditioning—the posterior chain. The deadlift is without a doubt the most productive strengthening exercise for the entire kinetic chain, giving a great benefit to any athlete that uses the exercise. As a deadlift is completed, every part of the posterior chain from the calves to the traps must work to make the lift successful. What coach wouldn’t want to use a lift that produces so much?
5. Improving one rep maxes boosts confidence.
Confidence levels can make or break a person, not just an athlete. Building confidence in an athlete can be applied across his entire life, helping him to succeed in any endeavor that he takes on. A very productive and simple way to build confidence in athletes is to allow them to see the progress they have made through setting personal records on lifts. If a football player can see that his bench press one rep maximum has improved by 30 pounds over the past year, it will go great lengths to boost his self-confidence, as strength is strongly associated to self-confidence in males.
Female athletes can also get a great amount of benefit from seeing their gains in strength. If a female volleyball player sees that her squat has improved by 10 pounds and knows that this will positively affect her vertical jump, she will attack the net that much more aggressively. If an athlete can see himself getting stronger through measuring maximum effort testing, it will only work to boost confidence, putting him in a better mindset to succeed athletically and in life. An incredible way to improve one rep maximums is through powerlifting focused training.
Though it is incredibly productive, by no means is powerlifting training the end all be all of sports conditioning. When powerlifting exercises and set and rep schemes are used in an athletic conditioning program along with other properly applied programming, the benefits can be monumental. Different training philosophies will come and go and functional training will eventually progress into the next trend, but being strong will never go out of style.
References
- Moss BM, Refsnes PE, Abildgaard A, Nicolaysen K, Jensen J (1997) Effects of maximal effort strength training with different loads on dynamic strength, cross-sectional area, load-power and load-velocity relationships. European Journal of Applied Physiology 75:193–99.
- Strong hops: the relationship between strength and jump height. Journal of Pure Power 5(1):33–5.
- Squat strength: strength may rule supreme over power. Journal of Pure Power 5(1):31–2.















Great article……waiting for the other end of the spectrum to chime in and say you’re wrong
Great article!!! I have listened too many times to football coaches bash the dead lift and power lifting in general. Very well written. Thank you.
I’ll disagree.
I have never seen a direct correlation between squats and vertical jump.
I squatted and deadlifted for years, and it never helped my vertical. When I stopped squatting and started working on jumping, and being explosive, then my vertical jump increased.
So I stopped squatting with my athletes. Then their verticals increased.
I’m not saying I’ve seen it all by any means, but I think there are better ways to improve speed and vertical leap.
Powerlifting is a great sport, I really enjoy it, but I don’t think it’s the best idea for a basketball player or volleyball player to train like a power lifter, just like i don’t think a powerlifter should train like a basketball or volleyball player.
I use everything except the Deadlift in training my athletes but thats only because i work with tall athletes and its difficult to get down to the bar with safe form
@ Jare – Why not squat (to increase maximal strength) and work on jumping (to train the jumping movement and explosiveness in that movement). I don’t see how the two are mutually exclusive. Do you stop training the hips, hams, quads, glutes, and calves in the weightroom all together? Or you just don’t squat? You still lunge, leg press, RDL, etc.?
It sounds like you built a great base of strength training your squat, then used that strength and built your explosiveness up training your jump specifically.
@ Nate – how tall is tall? I’m 6’6″. A tall athlete’s form isn’t any different than a short athletes, it’s just longer. The physics is the same.
@Jare – Vertical jump is about rate of force development. Your max force available, how much of it you can tap into, and how fast you can tap into it makes up how high you can jump. Increasing the max force available helps.
@Nate/Nathan – I’m 5’7, my buddy is 6’5. When we dead lift, his locked out bar is ~1″ higher off the ground than mine. The angles of our bodies throughout the lift are also very similar, just the length of each lever in his system is so much longer.
@jare
When he is speaking about strength he is speaking about all strength not just absolute. Think of it this way an athlete may be strong enough to vertical leap 30 inches but not explosive enough and vice versa.
@Jare
I think Supertraining cites a study that attributed 80% of the variance in speed strength to maximal strength, so there is definitely evidence to suggest that increasing maximal strength with benefit sprinting and jumping.
However, a few points/questions:
1. As the qualification of the athlete increases, so too must the specificity of the training stimulus i.e. less squatting (to a point), more jumping etc.
2. Good training programs assess both the biomotor demands of the event and the biomotor abilities of the athlete, then programming addresses discrepancies that exist between the two. Could it be that your “weak link” was RFD and not max strength? and that was why your jumps improved?
3. I would argue that developing maximal strength benefits nearly all aspects of performance, with those benefits being far broader than that of DE training. To exclude it from training altogether is foolish.
Everything has a time and a place. I think the trick is knowing where and when.
Weight training itself for athletes is general in nature, is it not? They are not powerlifters, they are not olympic lifters, but that doesn’t mean they still can’t reap the benefits of including barbell training in their athletic development training program.
No matter how you look at it, the end goal is getting the athletes as fast and explosive as possible by getting them strong in various planes of movement, mobile enough to get into proper sport position, and explosive through various means whether that be jump training, Olympic lifts, resisted jumps, etc.
There are many ways to get there, but the method you choose doesn’t necessarily mean you are wrong.
Teach with what you’re comfortable with; I know many programs that include ZERO Olympic lifts and produce extremely fast and strong athletes; I also know of other programs that are more Olympic lift based and still get results as well..
Oh, @Jare you can’t just squat all day and expect your vertical jump to go up. You still have to practice jumping, sprinting, throwing medicine balls, work on mobility, etc.
Train both sides of the spectrum, but something has to give.. Train smarter, not harder.
Wouldnt all the “power” benefits of the ME method make the DE method obsolete? Or do you see it as a way to somewhat “sharpen,” if you will, the power that is elicited by ME only training?
No matter what the intent is, heavy loads still move slow.
I want to thank everyone for the feedback. I appreciate it. I know there is a lot of debate about what is appropriate and not appropriate as it applies to athletes. I think that Keir and John Cortese have very good comments on the topic. You have to do what is appropriate for your athlete, using powerlifting movements and rep schemes is merely one tool in a large tool box.
I think it also has to be remembered that lifting weights is not only to improve strength and power. There is also the hypertrophy component, as well as injury prevention. Moving big loads via squatting and deadlifting, IMO, achieve both of these goals rather well.
Great article! In my experience, the concept most coaches (head coaches, not strength coaches) do not understand is dynamic effort lifts. Jumping, running, and throwing are great for developing explosive force, but don’t forget about things like speed rack pulls against bands, speed squats from a box (or suspended), speed bench with chains… MAN! There is so much fun to be had!