This is kind of a continuation of an idea that I got from an article the Angry Strength Coach wrote a while ago along with a correspondence last summer with the Thinker and knowledge from my own studies and experiences.
Over the last six years, I’ve been fortunate to have coached football. I’ve also been a coach of physical preparation at both the high school and collegiate levels. I’m a product of my learning, experiences, and interactions as a physical preparation coach. It has always amazed me how much science goes into planning the programming of off-season workout programs, but yet when it comes to the programming and planning for sport practices, there seems to be no science, just “This is how my coach did it, so this is how I’m going to do it.” Egos seem to dominate the planning of practice rather than practical reasoning and scientific evidence. All I’m trying to do is give some consideration to how to structure practices based on knowledge that much smarter people than I have formulated toward the programming of physical preparation programs and implement it into football practices.
All too often, sports coaches and physical preparation coaches don’t interact unless it’s to explain a bench max or something dealing with their athletes. Unfortunately, there is a line that separates the physical preparation from the sport and the sports coaches. If both sides (physical preparation/sport coach) have the same goal, which is to best prepare their team for games, why is there such a distinct line between them? Many coaches who frequent this site know of the great coaches like Buddy Morris and Charlie Francis. (If you aren’t familiar with these coaches, I highly advice doing some research on them.) Those coaches incorporate into their physical preparation programs much of what coaches like Charlie Francis practice, preach, and have extensively studied. So why then do they only limit it to the off-season preparation program? Why can’t such methods be used to optimally program practices in order to better the athletes?
“Efficiency is the highest result obtained in the least amount of time and effort.” — Thomas Kurtz
We must be wary of what is optimal and what is overworking our athletes while planning practices. We must be aware of what types of stress the various forms of practice have on our athletes. Just because there is a lot of work to do in order to best prepare your team for game day doesn’t mean that your athletes must overtrain with marathon practices, multiple high intensity practices back to back, suicides, crab walks, and bear crawls, all of which are still methods of conditioning and punishment that are used today.
When learning technique along with tactics, athletes should be in a ready state of preparedness and a readiness to learn. They shouldn’t be in a state of fatigue where their already short attention spans and their willingness to digest and learn is exhausted. I’m not saying that we shouldn’t work our athletes hard, but our work must be optimized so that the highest result is obtained and they are ready to peak for competition, not for a Thursday practice.
Central nervous system (CNS): Complex nerve tissues that control activities of the body. This system comprises the brain and spinal cord.
The functional definition of CNS: Any type of maximum speed and explosive exercise/movement. The various drills ran in practice impose stress. Certain forms of stress require greater time to recover from than others.
Symptoms of CNS fatigue:
- Loss of performance or technique
- Frequent cramping
- Loss of concentration
- Sleeplessness
- Depression
It’s important to understand the difference between CNS fatigue and muscular fatigue. Both systems don’t recover in the same way and at the same speed and time. Stress to the CNS requires longer periods of time to fully recover from. CNS overtraining is caused by high intensity work that occurs too frequently at a volume that’s too high in a single workout/practice and or a collection of workouts/practices when residual fatigue still exists.
High intensity (max effort) = 95 percent total physical effort or above (48–72 hours to recover)
Low intensity (tempo) = 75 percent total physical effort or below (12–24 hours to recover)
We must then make every possible attempt to organize practice drills and practices so that the high practices, which contain the most CNS intensive drills, are separated with practices of lower intensity drills.
Example practice schedule
Friday night game
- H, L, H, L, G
- L, H, L, L, G
Saturday game
- H, L, H, L, L, G
- L, H, L, H, L, G
Each and every athlete/coach/person has a limited amount of energy in the CNS or “gas” in the “gas tank.” It takes 48–72 hours in order to fill that gas tank back up to full. By not allowing the tank to be filled back up, we run the risk of running low or “burning out” our athletes by the time our Friday night game comes around.
The benefits of setting up our weekly practices in this manner allows the same amount of volume to be done over the course of the week, but it splits up the intensities in order to allow for better recovery. It allows our athletes’ gas tanks to be closer to full rather than empty by the time competition rolls around.
High intensity example
One group works out while the other group attends meetings
Meetings, 30–45 minutes
Offensive practice, 45–60 minutes
Break into individual positions
- Wide receivers: Route running versus defensive backs, stalk blocking versus defensive backs
- Quarterbacks: three-step drop, five-step drop, roll outs
- Quick read tests
- Running backs: Hole recognition, pass blocking drills versus linebackers, inside run
- Offensive linemen: Bag drills, partner drills, lover’s lane, inside run
Offensive Group work
- Fast paced, run through script
- Run through first down and second and long plays
- Two-minute drill
- Defensive practice, 45–60 minutes
Dynamic team
- Defensive backs: Back peddle drills, 1 on 1s versus wide receivers, stalk block versus wide receivers
- Linebackers: Bag drills, tackling drills, inside run
- Defensive linemen: Bag drills, shoot drills, lover’s lane, inside run
Defensive Group Work
- Fast paced, run through script
- Practice versus first down and second and long plays
Low-Intensity practice example
Offensive and defensive team meetings, 35–45minutess
Dynamic team warm-up
- Offensive practice, 30–60 minutes
Individual positions
- Wide receivers: Release technique, catching technique, coverage recognition, mental reps
- Quarterbacks: Drops, reads, mental reps
- Running backs: Reads, blocking assignments, mental reps
- Offensive linemen: Reads, assignments, mental reps
Team
- Team walk through
- Reads and recognitions
- Defensive practice, 30–60 minutes
Individual positions
- Defensive backs: Technique work, route recognition, mental reps
- Linebacker: Technique work, play recognition, mental reps
- Defensive linemen: Technique work, mental reps
Team
- Team walk through
- Reads and recognitions
- Special teams practice, 15–30 minutes
I hope I’ve sparked some thoughts whether they’re good ones or bad ones. I’m just looking to open up people’s thought processes in hopes they’ll look outside the box and figure out how to best prepare their athletes. I’ll leave you with this question—would you rather know everything there is about training but not be allowed to implement it or not know anything about training and overtrain your athletes?










Great article, I love it and I agree with the fact that sport coaches use traditions instead of science or logic. They could learn a lot from physical preparation coach like how to manage intensity like you showed us.
When I was playing football at school, we were doing only high intensity trainings through the week and punishment conditionnings. The result, we were completly wasted at the game.
How would one change this for basketball? I coach basketball and would love to hear anyones thoughts and ideas on the subject.
Great article. It makes sense for coaches to consider what is optimal for the athlete during increased stress through sports practices. It amazes me how many coaches have poor in season programs and try to whip their athletes into shape during the season. What happened the months before the season started?
This was a great article. I think It all goes back to coaches not being properly educated while they are getting their college degree. I can’t think of anything else that would change anything except for the universities to revamp their P.E. curriculums totally. Football coaches (ANY coaches really) throughout the country have no research, standard, or anything to base their practice schedules off of so they pretty much do either what their coaches did, or what they see other coaches do with no research backing it up. Long-term research examples I’m talking about are: how to schedule High and low intensity practices, what drills work and which ones don’t, how long to work on individual drills, and how long to work on team drills ect… and don’t forget about basic sprint technique. If coaches only knew that by not conditioning their players to exhaustion all the time they would be much more able to perform throughout the game and season, not to mention better preparing them for the next level if that’s an option. Here is a personal example of the lack of knowledge: The first day of fall camp we had a 6am morning practice, our conditioning test at 2p.m. which was 16-100 meter dashes with 45 sec. rest between each. Us skill guys had to make it in 15 sec. which I doubt anyone did for real. (Aug. in Alabama at 2 P.M =not fun). AFTER that later on we had another 2 and a half hour practice. Sometimes I really truly cannot believe the ignorance of some coaches because they wonder why their players can’t break on the ball fast enough after being destroyed by 110’s…
I would encourage you to divulge more than just a simple reproduction from the angry coach, as well as James. The PASM while many make claims to understand, can hardly grasp beyond the epidermis of its organic process. Then come on here and applaud their own efforts on a indifferent exposition.